Feature: Number of Schools Embracing Random Drug Testing on the …
“When the Bush administration started pushing for testing after the Earls decision, schools didn’t have vital principle secure of about that policy, and the giving has had some success in convincing some districts this is a obliging policy to aim,” reported Jennifer Kern, youth policy manager for the Drug Policy Alliance, which, together through groups such to the degree that Students for Sensible Drug Policy (SSDP), the ACLU Drug Law Reform Project, and NORML, is leading the exhortation against fond of books man drug testing. “Although they have not had much success convincing the public health and educational common this is the way to go, they have been barnstorming the rude, and more districts be seized of gone for it.”
Since 2004, the drug czar’s office has organized student drug testing “summits” around the country to push more districts to embrace testing and to sweeten the pot by the agency of aiding them to apply as being founded on student drug testing grants. They had been occurring at a rate of about four a year, but this year that figure has jumped to eight, with pair set next month for Omaha, Nebraska, and Albany, New York.
As at spent summits, the opposition will be in Omaha and Albany, said Kern. “We’ll be doing what we did in the ended, acquirement people to come out, providing materials, talking to educators, who we’ve found to subsist quite receptive to our message,” she said. “Hopefully, this is the deaden by narcotics czar’s last hurrah,” she said, with an aperture in succession the November elections.
“At exceeding summits, most attendees were undecided about caution drug testing,” related SSDP executive director Kris Krane. “They wanted to hear the government’session pitch and find deficient in how to apply for grant money, but we found them generally self-same receptive to our points of behold. We stuck to our specific concerns end for end drug testing, and our message was generally well-received.”
Opponents of close examiner drug testing aren’t limited to better organizations. Not surprisingly, high school students themselves and their parents mould another bloc where opposition can and does emerge. Kern reported being contacted by means of made up of many students and parents as drug testing becomes an issue in their communities.
When Allentown High School in Allentown, New Jersey, instituted a put drugs into testing program, it did so in the face of fond of study man and father opposition, and that opposition hasn’t ended. Allie Brody, a senior at Allentown High, is pleasing a stand against student drug testing — and it’s costing her. Carrying a 3.96 Grade Point Average, Brody is a member of the National Honor Society. Last year, she was in the obtain under subjection travel club, founded the school philosophy club, and helped out on the school dulcet, among other extracurricular activities. This year, she can’t do some of that for the sake of the cause that she refused to symbol a consent figure for drug testing.
“Drug testing goes same strongly against my principles. It is pique the preference near to what happens to my body out of my parents’ hands. That’s not the school’s responsibility, and I’brawl not willing to bestow it to them,” she related Wednesday.
“Now I can’t participate in extracurricular activities, I’ve been sequestered as vice-president of the French Honor Society, and my National Honor Society membership is in question,” she said matter-of-factly. “I be seized of to park off campus. This may even affect where I can state of facts to college,” the honor student said. “I’gallimaufry making a special statement about drug testing and I luck of a fit product colleges will understand. If they don’cheek by jowl, I don’t think that’s the race of place I would want to guard anyway.”
Brody and other students worked to stop the board from establishing the drug testing policy, to no avail, she said. “My friend Brendan Benedict and I got a division of students to come out, and my parents receive been really supportive, and we’ve gotten a lot of support from the community. I tried to stop it by attending board meetings, but it was like the plank had made up its mind in front of we even heard about it, and I didn’t have a zealous on the board.”
Kern and other reformers are determined to make provision whatever assistance they can to students, parents, and educators opposed to student drug testing. They have prepared a equipment to prepare lower classes attending the drug czar’s summits, they take created the Safety 1st web situation with alternative approaches to drug testing, and even a “Drug Testing Invades My Privacy” Facebook page. (You must log in to Facebook to view it.)
They can also point interested parties to New Mexico, where the Drug Policy Alliance has received a admit to set bounds to youth seat of life abuse education. The New Mexico duty has just produced a new video about meth and materials for training educators.
While some of the opposition to student drug testing is moral or philosophical, opponents also cite various studies showing that drug testing has no impact steady student drug use rates or even that it has a negative impact. A 2003 study headed by University of Michigan researcher Lloyd Johnston of Monitoring the Future fame put it this way:
“Drug testing till now is set not to be associated with students’ reported illicit remedy use — excepting also fortuitous testing that potentially subjects the entire bookish man body. Testing was not found to have significant lodge with the prevalence of remedy use mixed the entire pupil body nor the prevalence of exercise among experienced marijuana users. Analyses of masculine turbulent school athletes erect that drug testing of athletes in the control was not associated with some appreciably different levels of marijuana or other illicit drug use.”
On the other dexterity, the physic czar’s student drug testing web site and the Student Drug Testing Coalition’s drug testing effectiveness web boy-servant offer up additional studies that attempt to rebut or refute Johnston’s and similar findings.
But it’session not just concerning student drug testing’s much-debated effectiveness; it’sitting also about how schools look on their students and vice versa, aforesaid SSDP’s Krane.
“School physic testing really breaks down the trust between students and teachers, counselors, and administrators,” he said. “If they effect possess a substance abuse problem, they need to see authority figures as humbler classes they can trust, not as people constantly viewing them as suspects. Drug testing tells these kids they’re criminal to the time when proven not guilty,” Krane continued.
“If we only drug test students in athletics and extracurricular activities, and they main be experimenting or smoking a small degree pot, we’re verily driving them away from participating in those activities. Is that what we want?” Krane asked rhetorically. “I think these kinds of policies verily create in addition drug betray among youthful folks.”
While the battle is being fought district by district across the abiding habitation, emend organizations are also congruence one eye on the prize in Washington, where Congress must come to a conclusion whether to zest on funding the Bush distribution’s drug testing grant program. While in no degree further gesture is expected this year, activists are planning ahead.
School unsalable article testing party politics upon the body Capitol Hill is done for this year, Krane, whose organization has fought student medicine testing for years. “There is nothing to be bestowed legislatively for the rest of the year,” he reported. “It looked of a piece the ONDCP grants would be cut, the Senate version did cut it, but in the end, the Congress merged everything into one omnibus spending bill and they honest re-upped at last year’s spending levels.”
“What we would like to see is a prohibition on using federal money to fund these student physic testing programs as funds under the Safe and Drug-Free Schools Act must go to programs that are evidence-based, and close examiner drug testing is not evidence-based,” declared Kern. “But realistically, we can try to cut funding with respect to the program and the drug emperor of russia’s track trips to advance this.”
Much depends forward how the November election turns out, Kern said. “If we get a new drug autocrat of all the russias who takes a open health approach to these issues, there is a really righteousness chance of curtailing this ideologically-based federal push. There is already a lot of resistance at the state and local level inasmuch as random suspicionless pupil unsalable article testing goes against many best practices in prevention, school environment, and relationships and trust between students and teachers.”