The law, passed this year after three failed attempts, has been lauded by law enforcement and groups who declaration drug-induced drivers are escaping unpunished at a time then their numbers are climbing.
“Love it,” said Gregg Thomson, a father from Kanata, Ont., who predicted Tuesday that the renovated testing will deter people from driving under the authority of drugs, just at the same time that the breathalyzer ordeal produced a drop in drunk driving.
Thomson has been lobbying for a new law since 1999, when his son, Stan, and four of his friends were killed when a 17-year-old who had been smoking marijuana attempted a public road surpass that led to a pileup.
The smash became a catalyst for the group Mothers Against Drunk Driving to come into existence suddenly pushing for changes to the Criminal Code, which outlaws drug-impaired driving but until now has not included measures that allow police to order a battery of tests.
The new law, however, has sparked warnings about potential court battles from critics who maintain that demanding bodily fluids is overly intrusive and scientifically unreliable in detecting drug impairment.
“This is going to exist challenged left and right,” predicted Murray Mollard, executory adviser of the British Columbia Civil Liberties Association.
Beginning nearest Wednesday, drivers suspected of sentient high will exist required to meet physical tests at the side of the road, such as walking a erect line.
If they break, they will be sent to the police position for further testing by a qualified “drug confession masterly.” and then be forced to give descendants, piss, or saliva samples if they flunk the stand by lydian stone as well.
Critics say the new law could cause further problems than it solves, particularly on this account that there is in no degree trustworthy philosophical test to find out drug use.
(Read the full post about ‘Law lets cops test drivers for drugs (Windsor Star)’…)